<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grammar 101: Tweeting.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.starvingcollegegirl.com/grammar-101-tweeting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.starvingcollegegirl.com/grammar-101-tweeting/</link>
	<description>Follow my journey as I strive to become a Public Relations professional on a student budget!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:48:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: NicholasPR</title>
		<link>http://www.starvingcollegegirl.com/grammar-101-tweeting/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>NicholasPR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starvingcollegegirl.com/?p=205#comment-68</guid>
		<description>I think English is just one of those languages with a whole host of exceptions to the rules. It doesn&#039;t all have to make sense, especially as language is intently changing and evolving. What was grammar like in Shakespearian time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think English is just one of those languages with a whole host of exceptions to the rules. It doesn&#8217;t all have to make sense, especially as language is intently changing and evolving. What was grammar like in Shakespearian time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley</title>
		<link>http://www.starvingcollegegirl.com/grammar-101-tweeting/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starvingcollegegirl.com/?p=205#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Oops, I shall make the change. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, I shall make the change. <img src='http://www.starvingcollegegirl.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley</title>
		<link>http://www.starvingcollegegirl.com/grammar-101-tweeting/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starvingcollegegirl.com/?p=205#comment-55</guid>
		<description>If that were the case, then &#039;facebooking&#039;, &#039;myspacing&#039; and &#039;youtubing&#039; could be a verb, but they&#039;re not. And if they were, they&#039;d mean something completely different than &#039;tweeting&#039;. It&#039;s like adding -ing to a brand or service. You don&#039;t go &quot;Fording&quot;, you buy the car and you drive it. Another example: Spas. You don&#039;t go &#039;spa-ing&#039;, you go to the spa. It&#039;s an English grammar nuance that drives me nuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that were the case, then &#8216;facebooking&#8217;, &#8216;myspacing&#8217; and &#8216;youtubing&#8217; could be a verb, but they&#8217;re not. And if they were, they&#8217;d mean something completely different than &#8216;tweeting&#8217;. It&#8217;s like adding -ing to a brand or service. You don&#8217;t go &#8220;Fording&#8221;, you buy the car and you drive it. Another example: Spas. You don&#8217;t go &#8216;spa-ing&#8217;, you go to the spa. It&#8217;s an English grammar nuance that drives me nuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NicholasPR</title>
		<link>http://www.starvingcollegegirl.com/grammar-101-tweeting/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>NicholasPR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starvingcollegegirl.com/?p=205#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Maybe Twittering is the collective use of making a 140 character post and tweeting refers to one individual. Just a thought!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Twittering is the collective use of making a 140 character post and tweeting refers to one individual. Just a thought!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kwan</title>
		<link>http://www.starvingcollegegirl.com/grammar-101-tweeting/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starvingcollegegirl.com/?p=205#comment-52</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad I could be a source of inspiration. On a side note, I wasn&#039;t an English &lt;em&gt;major&lt;/em&gt;. I had English Lit as my &lt;em&gt;minor&lt;/em&gt;. I majored in Psychology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad I could be a source of inspiration. On a side note, I wasn&#8217;t an English <em>major</em>. I had English Lit as my <em>minor</em>. I majored in Psychology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
